Mobile Home Park News Briefing

Mobile Home Park Investing Audios | Mobile Home Park Investing Videos | Mobile Home Park Mastery Podcast



Palisades News: Filming Spot for ‘Succession’, Mobile Home Park among Palisades Properties Declared Public Nuisances

Preview:

Each property was damaged during recent wildfires and failed to meet the city’s Oct. 2 deadline to clear ash, rubble, and fire debris

Los Angeles officials have declared eight fire-damaged properties in the upscale Pacific Palisades neighborhood public nuisances, citing health and safety risks from toxic debris that remains uncleared nearly two weeks after a city-imposed deadline.

The Board of Building and Safety Commissioners voted unanimously on Oct. 8 to designate the properties — a mix of luxury estates, multifamily units and mobile home parks — as public nuisances under the city’s municipal code. The move empowers the city to...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

And another park bites the dust.

The Aspen Times: Roaring Fork Valley mobile homes purchase closes

Preview:

Residents’ purchase of two mobile home parks in the Roaring Fork Valley closed on Wednesday at around 4 p.m. as ink dried on the contract between the seller, Investment Property Group, and the residents of the Aspen Basalt and Mountain Valley Mobile Home Parks.

This officially kicks off a new chapter for the two parks as resident-owned communities. 

“From that first meeting when the purchase price felt out of reach to closing day, the residents of Aspen Basalt never stopped believing in what was possible,” Tim Townsend, the program director of Thistle, a nonprofit that assisted the two parks in their purchase, said in a press release...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Residents of two parks now own the land under their feet via resident-ownership, but with higher rent

So after forging a Frankenstein smorgasbord of financing that will probably collapse in five years (just like those 4 ROC bankruptcies in Canon City already have) the residents ENDED UP PAYING THE SAME MONTHLY RENT THEY WOULD HAVE PAID WITH A PRIVATE EQUITY BUYER, EXCEPT THE RESIDENTS WILL BE UNABLE TO COLLECT RENT OR ENFORCE RULES FROM THEIR PEERS NOR HAVE THE MONEY TO MAKE MAJOR CAP-X IMPROVEMENTS. What a great combo: higher rent and lower quality of life. Way to go, non-profits!

The Business Journal: Fresno awarded $5M to repurpose beleaguered mobile home park

Preview:

The City of Fresno has been awarded $4.9 million from California’s Homekey+ Program to help preserve and revitalize La Hacienda Mobile Estates, formerly known as Trails End Mobile Home Park at 104 E. Sierra Ave., the city announced Thursday.   

The funding will be used to create affordable and permanent housing for homeless veterans.

The city is partnering with Self-Help Enterprise (SHE) and will use the funds to purchase and install 18 new manufactured homes — 12 one-bedroom and six two-bedroom units for veterans facing homelessness, mental health issues or substance use challenges. 

The funding will also preserve the existing mobile...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

And another park bites the dust.

WTSP: Residents being relocated as Pinellas County mobile home park faces rezoning

Preview:

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — A flood-damaged mobile home park in Pinellas County could soon be redeveloped, but as plans move forward, some residents say they’re being pushed out of the only community they’ve known for years.

The Twin City Mobile Home Park was hit hard by last year’s hurricanes. Many of the homes were deemed uninhabitable, and now the property owner is asking the county to rezone the land from Residential Mobile/Manufactured Home to Multifamily Residential. The change would allow up to 266 housing units, compared to 64 now.

As part of the rezoning process, residents are being cleared from the property. County records show...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

And another park bites the dust.

WFAE: Mobile home park residents facing displacement say $5,500 relocation offer isn't enough

Preview:

Residents of a mobile home park off Prosperity Church Road in northeast Charlotte could soon have to move, as a developer plans to buy the land and build apartments and stores. However, residents say the relocation assistance they’re being offered isn’t enough.

Forest Park Mobile Homes residents say they are being provided $5,500 to relocate. Developer Wood Partners plans to build nearly 400 apartments and 25,000 square feet of commercial space.

The park now has about 60 homes, many owned by working-class immigrant families. Residents own their homes, not the land, but many have made additions, investing tens of thousands of dollars, that...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Developer Wood Partners plans to build nearly 400 apartments and 25,000 square feet of commercial space.

Jamming 400 apartment units on a 60-space mobile home park parcel is not hard as you can take an apartment complex up several stories and a mobile home park is only on one level. There’s no way a mobile home park can compete with that alternative use. As more park owners figure this out – spurred on by rent control and ridiculous laws –the faster park redevelopment will accelerate.

And, as I’ve said hundreds of times, another park bites the dust.

WSVN: About 220 Li’l Abner Mobile Home Park residents evicted as new property owners continue demolition

Preview:

SWEETWATER, FLA. (WSVN) - Deputies are kicking residents out of a nearly fully demolished mobile home park in Sweetwater, months after they were ordered to leave.

7News cameras on Monday captures the remaining residents of Li’l Abner Mobile Home Park as they packed up their belongings.

Between Monday and Tuesday, Miami-Dade Sheriff’s Office deputies served eviction notices for the around 220 residents who did not leave after a developer purchased the property and gave notice to the tenants.

“We don’t know where we’re gonna go,” said Enrique, a resident who turned down the developer’s settlement offer.

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

And another park bites the dust.

The Sun Chronicle: City council sends petition to Legislature to form rent control board for Attleboro mobile home parks

Preview:

ATTLEBORO — The city council has unanimously approved a petition aimed at forming a board to combat soaring costs at mobile home parks, which are typically communities of elderly and retired individuals living on fixed incomes.

In July, several residents came before the council to ask that a petition to be sent to the state Legislature to allow Attleboro to create a rent control board that would oversee mobile home land and occupancy payments and make sure prices stay within residents’ means.

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

At their Tuesday night meeting, several councilors agreed that voting to send the rent control petition would be in the city’s best interest, given that the timeline on the statewide bill is unknown. However, there is no guarantee on the timeline for Attleboro’s petition either.

I know nothing about Attleboro, Massachusetts, other than they are obviously woke idiots.

Given their intense hatred of park owners, why would anyone not just tear their “trailer park” down and build something else – like apartments – on the land? Clearly, they have not thought this through very well.

Yahoo! News: Chicopee mobile home case heard in Appellate Court session at Western New England School of Law

Preview:

SPRINGFIELD — Tenants of a Chicopee mobile home park have been in a court battle with both the city’s mobile home rental control board and the owner of the park since 2023.

On Wednesday morning, appeal arguments were heard in a special sitting of three Appellate Court associate justices at Western New England University’s School of Law in front of a room of students.

The appellate review process is the last resort for the majority of state litigants seeking relief from an appeal, according to the court.

Linda Ducharme, a resident of Holiday Park Phase I, a mobile home park on Holiday Circle Road in Chicopee, filed her original complaint...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

The housing court judge also could not review the hearing because the recording of the board’s hearing was repeatedly inaudible. He ultimately said that the rights of the tenants may have been prejudiced because the board did not afford them the opportunity for a “full and fair hearing,” violating their due process rights, according to court documents

Are these people nuts? Who would want to own a mobile home park when this is considered sensible by the court system? A smart owner would surely just tear their park down and put in a better use.

Saco Bay News: Saco to consider moratorium on mobile home lot increases

Preview:

After listening to local mobile home park residents, the Saco City Council will make a future vote on a mobile home lot rent moratorium to allow time for review before it considers a new ordinance.

In August, residents of Blue Haven Mobile Home Park in Saco received a notice that all lot rents would increase to $660 monthly, beginning Dec. 1. This would be the second increase of the year, and some residents say it would mean a 28 percent increase in their lot rent this year. Many residents say that rent increases are hard to justify when the roads in the park have potholes and other repairs need to be made.

In September, several state...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Washington State already has rent control, but some cities think it’s simply not enough – they want a zero increase and not even CPI. Why not take it a step farther and simply declare that all rent is free? Why hold back on the whole socialist agenda?

Clearly Washington State wants all mobile home parks to be torn down and developed into some other use WITHOUT rent control.

Why not give them what they want?

Los Angeles Times: Why an affordable slice of L.A. paradise might never recover from the Palisades fire

Preview:

As local and state leaders celebrate the fastest wildfire debris removal in modern American history, the Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Home Estates — a rent-controlled, 170-unit enclave off Pacific Coast Highway — remains largely untouched since it burned down in January.

Weeds grow through cracks in the broken pavement. A community pool is filled with a murky, green liquid. There’s row after row of mangled, rusting metal remains of former homes.

Yet just across a nearly 1,500-foot-long shared property line, the Tahitian Terrace mobile home park — like thousands of fire-destroyed properties cleared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

“FEMA denied cleanup services, arguing it couldn’t trust that the land owners, with a history of attempting to redevelop the park into something more lucrative, would let residents rebuild.”

Who in their right mind would put a mobile home park back on land that is virtually on the beach and subject to rent control? Are you kidding me? There are way more profitable uses available for this land and – now that all the tenants are gone – no restrictions on shutting the park down (you don’t even need a wrecking ball as nothing is left standing on the land after the fire).

Socialism only works when landlords have no other options. If California liked affordable housing in general – and mobile home parks in particular – they should have thought of that before they enacted rent control and a pile of other ridiculous anti-landlord regulations. After all, you reap what you sow.

Wisconsin Public Radio: Residents consider a cooperative future as manufactured housing parks go up for sale

Preview:

Standing on her porch, Vikki Braker pointed out her favorite lawn cutouts, arranged in a colorful scene: Silhouettes of two children smelled pink flowers as a line of googly-eyed red ants marched beneath their feet. A tree stretching over them wore a Green Bay Packers hat.

The decorations were among many Braker inherited during nearly half a century at Cedar Falls Acres mobile home park near Menomonie, Wisconsin. She figures more people get to enjoy her outdoor display than anything she keeps inside.

Neat rows of brick bordered each decorative scene atop grass her son had trimmed. Even as she slows down in her yard work, the 67-year-old...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Large corporations are taking their place, often raising lot rents and sometimes neglecting conditions.

Can someone please show me just one example – in the entire United States – in which a mobile home park purchased by a private equity group looks WORSE a year after they buy it? You can’t because it doesn’t exist. I know that the woke folk love this mantra, but it makes no sense that a mobile home park would be “neglected” after the private equity buyer pours hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars into infrastructure upgrades and aesthetic improvements to common areas. THIS IS THE DUMBEST TALKING POINT OF ALL TIME.

On the topic of raising rents, yes, private equity groups – and any buyer – will raise rents to market levels and that INCLUDES the tenants if they have a non-profit buy it. When you slap millions of dollars of debt on a mobile home park, you have to service a giant mortgage and that necessitates higher rents. Who’s to blame? I guess moms and pops who refuse to give their life’s investment away for free but instead opt for an often multi-million-dollar profit. It’s called capitalism, and the entire U.S. economy is based on it, and has been since its founding.

M Live: A new Portage housing development hopes to create long-term affordable housing

Preview:

PORTAGE, MI -- Off Portage Road, between Stanley Avenue and Woodbine Avenue, is a large lot where two newly-built houses stand. It’s the site of Stanwood Crossings, a new community where the homes are for sale — but the land is owned by the city of Portage’s land trust.

 

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

PORTAGE, MI -- Off Portage Road, between Stanley Avenue and Woodbine Avenue, is a large lot where two newly-built houses stand. It’s the site of Stanwood Crossings, a new community where the homes are for sale — but the land is owned by the city of Portage’s land trust.

This is the latest woke concept: have people own their stick-built homes but not the land. The homeowner does not share in any of the appreciation on their home value and have to sell it back at par if they ever want to leave. A non-profit owns the land under all the homes. It’s the socialist version of housing in which everyone never amasses wealth so the bureaucrats don’t get jealous.

KQED: In San Rafael, Residents of a Mobile Home Park Are Fighting to Keep Their Homes

Preview:

Tucked between Highway 101, a BevMo and a car dealership, about 45 RV parking spots line both sides of a one-lane road.

The homes at the RV Park of San Rafael are tiny, some decorated with potted plants, most sit behind short fences. On a recent evening, children ran in and out of the park’s laundromat as their parents threw piles of clothes into washing machines.

Yessica Pérez was seven when her parents moved the family there.

“In the beginning, I think we were the only children in the neighborhood because there were a lot of seniors living here,” she said. “Then, just little by little, there were a lot of Hispanic kids running around...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

This article is missing one key element in the “landlords are evil” narrative: a motive. Why would a mobile home park owner want to make tenants leave? Mobile home parks lose around $10,000+ every time a tenant vacates their home. If the park owner is trying to enforce rules, it’s a safe bet it’s because the tenants in question are ruining the quality of the community for the other residents. The job of the park owner is to watch over the quality of life for the 99% that try hard and follow the rules and not the 1% that don’t want to live in a civilized society.

realtor.com: Residents Defy Eviction From Mobile Home Park—4 Months After City Declares It Unsafe

Preview:

Four months after Riverside Mobile Home Park in Toledo, OH, was condemned as “unfit for human habitation,” tenants are still living there. With the water shut off and demolition crews on standby, residents say they have nowhere to go.

“We’re trying all the time to find a place,” Susan Luttrell, one of the residents, told 13 Action News. “We’re not trying to just stay here. ... All the rents are so high. When you’re on Social Security, under $1,000 a month, you can’t pay $800 a month on rent. You can’t do it.”

Meanwhile, the Chicago-based owners are trying to sell the condemned park for $750,000—even as they face nearly a quarter million...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

“We’re not trying to just stay here. ... All the rents are so high. When you’re on Social Security, under $1,000 a month, you can’t pay $800 a month on rent. You can’t do it.”

In a softer, gentler world apparently judges no longer have the guts to say “get out of there” but instead seek every opportunity to coddle folks that game the system on a continual basis. Any sane person can see this is wrong, but nobody with authority does anything about it.

The only thing memorable in this article is the quote shown above. It seems that the tenants always complain about absolutely everything the owner does and then misses them horribly when the park shuts down. It’s a totally dysfunctional relationship. It would be nice if park owners were appreciated while they were still in business, not after. It might cause fewer parks – like this one – to shut down.

And, as always, another park bites the dust.

Local News Matters: 37 years later, Novato renters still tussle with city for ownership of mobile home park

Preview:

IN 1988, the tenants of a mobile home community in Novato formed a nonprofit corporation for the specific purpose of purchasing the park and facilitating its conversion into a resident-owned park. Thirty-seven years later, a new generation of residents are still trying to buy it.

Nestled between two green hills, just east of the Loma Verde Preserve in Novato, a cluster of white mobile homes at the Marin Valley Mobile Country Club face the rising sun over San Pablo Bay. The 400 aging renters who live there said they love looking down across a field of safflower at the water and watching the marsh hawks and deer. They are willing to pay...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

They are willing to pay $23.5 million to buy the park. The city wants $26 million

Yeah, I know this is the same boring topic from last week, but it’s just fun to see the city being cast as the “evil landlord” for a change.

The Sopris Sun: Cavern Springs Mobile Home Park fight to save their community

Preview:

On Saturday, Sept. 27, the Colorado Democratic Latino Caucus stopped by Glenwood Springs to meet with the Sopris Mountain Collective, a cooperative formed by Cavern Springs Mobile Home Park residents. The stop was part of the Caucus’ “Western Swing Listening Tour,” a biennial effort to connect legislators with communities across the four corners of Colorado.

Five legislators — Representatives Elizabeth Velasco, Javier Mabrey, Julie Gonzales, Matt Martinez and Alex Valdez — joined residents for the meeting. “I think it was a good meeting, and the fact that they came specifically to listen to us means a lot to me,” Judith Alvarez, president...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Owning the park would prove to them that collective action can create change. “The intention is that instead of people getting rich, we can invest what we earn to improve the park,” said Alvarez.

I’m sorry, but this is just plain wrong. The residents never invest in any cap-x because they never collect the money from their friends and the park simply spirals into a financial mess. Let’s at least be honest here and skip the “collective action can create change” nonsense. That has to be the dumbest quote since the Kamala Harris campaign shut down.

FOX23: Saco considers ordinance to protect mobile home park residents from rent increases

Preview:

SACO (WGME) -- Saco city officials are considering a new ordinance to protect mobile home park residents from substantial rent increases.

The proposed ordinance comes after tenants at the Blue Haven Mobile Park told city councilors that they were facing unfair rent increases.

aco isn't alone in this issue.

Several towns across Maine have adopted rent freezing moratoriums or rent control ordinances in recent months to prevent landlords from hiking up rent costs.

City councilors won't make a decision Monday night at their meeting, but they'll look at how other nearby communities have handled the issue and consider it for their own ordinance.

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

I gave up on the intelligence of Maine years ago (remember that Susan Collins is their senator, after all). They should just get on with demolishing all the parks there and make them into apartment complexes. That’s where it’s all heading.

The Providence Journal: Residents battle investors and neighbors to buy $13M Portsmouth trailer park

Preview:

PORTSMOUTH – When Sharlene Patton started knocking on her neighbors' doors in the 22-acre Sunny Acres Trailer Park, most of the time she received no response.

Patton was trying to gather signatures because the mobile home park is set to be sold to Crown Communities LLC, a Wyoming-based investment firm that operates trailer parks, for $13 million. Rhode Island, like many states, allows the people who rent the land in trailer parks to band together and exercise a right of first refusal when their land goes up for sale, at the same price already agreed to by Crown Communities.

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Some battle. I’m sure the seller is more than happy to take the non-profit’s $13 million. Who wouldn’t? The residents, on the other hand, would be totally screwed in this transaction. Their new landlord would effectively be a non-profit who has no skin-in-the-game and typically jumps ship at the first loan renewal. In the interim, the tenants can’t collect rent from their friends nor raise rents, and the park dies a slow death of bad living quality and unpaid cap-x needs. Look no further than those four ROC foreclosures in Canon City, Colorado for the true story.

The Sonoma Index-Tribune: Sonoma mobile home park residents ask city to update mandated park protections

Preview:

Sonoma leaders, in the coming weeks, will review a plan to update the city statute regulating mobile home park closures, conversions and cessation of use in response to mobile home park residents who say the city’s existing “outdated” policies endanger a significant affordable housing option and leave them vulnerable to corporate park owners.

During City Council’s Sept. 17 meeting, a group of more than 20 residents and mobile home park advocates told city leaders Sonoma’s existing ordinance, which was adopted in 2004, no longer provides them with sufficient protection in today’s rapidly changing and evermore costly housing...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

As if mobile home park residents don’t have enough protections in California already, right? It’s a miracle that any park owner puts up with this nonsense for another day and doesn’t just demolish their park and put up any use that has no rent control (which is almost all of them).

KTVU: San Rafael tenant lawsuit may determine if RV parks are mobile home parks too

Preview:

San Rafael, California - Another mobile home drama is playing out in San Rafael, which could impact other parks that are populated mostly by that the DMV calls RV's. 

The San Rafael RV Park is a tiny San Rafael enclave, where tenants are suing the relatively new owner. Any vehicle that is deemed a recreation vehicle is either self-propelled or a towable trailer. But can it also be a mobile home? 

In San Rafael, where Highway 101 meets Interstate 580, the Park of San Rafael has space for 45 mobile homes and RV's on a one lane street called Baxter's Court. At the moment, there are seven empty spaces available since some people left or were...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

No, RV parks are NOT mobile home parks. Any idiot knows that an RV park does not require a HUD seal on the homes sited there while mobile home parks do. The tenants want to re-classify this RV park as a mobile home park simply to try and declare rent control. If this was any state but California, this concept wouldn’t go anywhere. But in the “Golden State” the rules of law no longer apply.

Local 10: Judges rule against Li’l Abner tenants as residents of mobile home park try to fight evictions

Preview:

MIAMI — Tuesday was deadline day for the remaining residents at the Li’l Abner Mobile Home Park in Sweetwater.

They had until noon to leave the property, which is being redeveloped.

Two separate Miami-Dade judges ruled against tenants trying to fight their evictions in separate hearings on Tuesday.

The judges each ordered that the stays on the plaintiffs’ evictions be lifted.

In Tuesday morning’s case, a woman claimed she was denied her due process rights.

“There’s a level of chaos of what’s going on here,” her attorney, David Winker, said. “Part of this is us trying to put order to this. These people never expected this to happen. People...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Two separate Miami-Dade judges ruled against tenants trying to fight their evictions in separate hearings on Tuesday. More than 200 families are currently suing, claiming they were not given proper notice about plans to close the mobile home park and redevelop it.

Yes, this is the never-ending saga in which a park owner has to endure the endless false claims of 200 residents who will not move out in order for the redevelopment of the park to start. Sure, it appears they have zero chance of success. But a weak Florida court system coddles their insanity and nobody seems to have the guts to simply tell them to get out. Pathetic.

And, as always, another park bites the dust.

Clarksville Now: Rezoning proposed to turn rundown trailer park into mixed-use development | PHOTOS

Preview:

CLARKSVILLE, TN (CLARKSVILLE NOW) – More than 14 acres off Trenton Road is proposed for rezoning in an effort to transition an old, rundown trailer park into a new mixed-use development.

The rezone from R-1 Single-Family Residential District to R-4 and C-5 north of Fairview Lane has passed first reading and will be revisited by the Clarksville City Council this week and next.

Clarksville lawyer Larry Rocconi expanded on the applicant’s plans at last month’s City Council regular session meeting. “Everybody knows Trenton Road, and I’m sure everybody has looked to the right (going north). There’s a trailer park with trailers in various...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

And another park bites the dust.

The Raincross Gazette: Housing Committee Discusses Mobile Home Rent Control Despite Council's Recent 2.8% Cap Approval

Preview:

The Riverside Housing and Homeless Committee discussed additional amendments to the city's Mobile Home Parks Rent Stabilization Ordinance Monday, just six days after the City Council approved capping annual rent increases at 2.8% beginning in 2026.

Despite the council's October 16 action that exceeded resident requests by setting a cap lower than the 3% being sought, the committee heard proposals for further changes including transparency requirements and restrictions on family transfer rent increases.

The committee took no action on the proposed amendments after contentious debate about whether additional changes were necessary given the...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Vice Chair Sean Mill criticized holding the discussion so soon after the council's decision, calling it "pure politics." Councilmember Jim Perry, invited to participate because his ward contains six mobile home parks, expressed surprise at the scope of proposals being discussed after the council had just acted."I thought we were going to be discussing adding clarity to pass-throughs and park maintenance," Perry said, referring to charges for capital improvements and utilities. "And there's much more here than that."

If there’s a single mobile home park left standing in Riverside, California a couple years from now, I’ll be shocked. What a bunch of idiots.

90.5 WESA: Southwestern Pa. mobile home residents push for limits on lot rent hikes

Preview:

Mary Sue Callaghan’s one-story home is on a small, quiet street in a manufactured home community just outside Mt. Pleasant, in Westmoreland County.

There are tidy shrubs and flowers along the front of the house.

An American flag hangs from the small porch.

Callaghan has lived here since 2006, when she and her husband moved in. They needed a home that was all on one level and wheelchair accessible because her husband — who has since passed away — had M-S. They purchased a manufactured home, also sometimes called a mobile home.

Callaghan, 67, loves her community. She and her sister, who now lives with her, often cook for other neighbors,...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

IN 2006, when Callaghan and her husband moved in, lot rent was $260 a month. It’s since more than doubled — to $540 a month.

Forget the fact that the mobile home park lot rent is less than half that of apartments. Forget the fact that the median home in this market is nearly $300,000. Let’s just focus on the fact that the rent was $260 in 2006 and now – 20 years later – it has doubled. That’s basically the same rate as inflation during this period. So what’s the problem here? Is this seriously the best a woke writer can come up with an article aimed at trying to push forward the Pennsylvania rent control initiative? Well, here’s the bad news for this media outlet. The Pennsylvania rent control known act, known as HB 1250, has not made one iota of progress since June and – with the aid of the Republican-held Senate – never will. People just aren’t this stupid any more.

The Aspen Times: Pitkin County hears details on deed restriction for mobile homes park purchase

Preview:

The West Mountain Regional Housing Coalition has been making the tour of local governments who contributed toward the Aspen Basalt and Mountain Valley Mobile Home Parks purchase to present them with details surrounding the communities’ deed restriction and their financial contribution. 

April Long, executive director of WMRHC, made a recent appearance in front of the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners on Thursday to fill them in and let the commissioners know what exactly their $3.25 million contribution was buying. 

“The deed restriction is an affordable housing restrictive covenant,” Long explained. “It runs with the property...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

“The loan agreement says that we are giving this money toward these purchases of these properties and that that money does not need to be repaid except upon resale of the property or foreclosure on the property,” Long explained. “In the event of foreclosure, if there’s enough money in the property to repay us in full, we would be repaid in full plus our interest requirement. If not, we will be paid a (proportional) share of the amount available.” 

Interesting that those who contributed to the non-profit “buying this park for the residents” are so particularly interested in what happens when the parks get foreclosed on. Maybe they saw that article about the four ROC parks in Canon, Colorado being foreclosed on recently.