Skip to main content

Mobile Home Park News Briefing

WENY: Future of Southport’s Cherry Lane Trailer Park uncertain

Preview:

TOWN OF SOUTHPORT, N.Y. (WENY) — After two years, discussions about the future of Cherry Lane Trailer Park are still ongoing.

During Tuesday’s town board meeting, several residents raised concerns about the state of the trailer park. They were eager to discuss the park with town officials, but were unable to do so during the meeting.

“What I told the public is that the board and the supervisor are still considering information, and it's still under review,” said Town of Southport Supervisor Joseph Roman. “We are still working on it as the town; that's the information that I have right now.”

Roman said the town was unable to provide a...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

And another park bites the dust.

WNYT: Sale of Saratoga Co. mobile home park has residents worried

Preview:

MALTA, N.Y. (WNYT)- Residents at Malta Gardens Mobile Home Park say a sale of the park has left them worried about evictions and what comes next.

Residents told NewsChannel 13 they have been informed the park was sold, but they said they do not know what the new owner plans to do with the property. Some said they have already received eviction notices, often because their homes are in disrepair or do not meet park standards.

The issue is especially difficult because residents own their mobile homes but rent the land beneath them. Residents said many of the homes are old and may not survive a move, while many people also cannot afford...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

The issue is especially difficult because residents own their mobile homes but rent the land beneath them. Residents said many of the homes are old and may not survive a move, while many people also cannot afford relocation.

Yeah, I know I was the inventor of the “Waffle House quote” but what exactly does trailer relocation have to do with anything? These folks bought those mobile homes because they’re incredibly cheap and have zero investment in the land underneath. That’s why they were able to get into the mobile home park for 1/100th of the cost of the single-family home owners down the street and share the same schools. If this park should redevelop, that’s the natural evolution of civilization and the tenants had a great run at a super-cheap price and now need to move on. Even if these homes could be moved easily – like the travel trailer that some think them to be – where would they put them? And any place they would go would be more expensive than where they’re living now, right?

Missoula Current: Missoula mobile park residents: ‘We’re an ATM for a soulless investment firm’

Preview:

(Missoula Current) For the second time this month, Missoula County is asking an out-of-state investment firm to meet and discuss the future of two mobile home parks and the impact that recent rent hikes have had on residents.

The letter, sent to Axia Realty Partners based in Dallas, again urges the firm to meet with residents and establish an open line of communication. This time, however, it also asks Axia to consider selling the properties so that residents may establish a resident-owned community.

“Residents in these communities own these homes but rent the land underneath it,” said John Wilke, the county's housing policy specialist....

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Give me a break – all companies are “soulless” if you define that “having a soul” means keeping their rents ridiculously low when market rents are much, much higher. All these folks insisting that professional investors hold their rents at amateur “mom & pop” levels are in for a rude awakening.

News 4 & Fox 11: Former Reno trailer park residents moved out; strip mall could replace low-income housing

Preview:

RENO, Nev. (News 4 & Fox 11) — Residents of a low-income mobile home park in south Reno have moved out after being told earlier this year by the owner that they had 30 days to leave, and people connected to the property say the land is likely headed for commercial development.

About a dozen mobile homes were still standing in the past week and were about to be removed or demolished at the former Evergreen Trailer Park off Virginia Street in south Reno.

In April, residents received a 30-day notice to move out. Lloyd Palmer, a former resident, said at the time, “Well, 30 days isn't enough, I don't think. We've been here nine years. I'm...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

And another park bites the dust.

The Aspen Times: Phillips Mobile Home Park could see rent increases in 2027

Preview:

Residents of Phillips Mobile Home Park in Woody Creek could see their monthly rent increase after the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners discussed those changes at a meeting Tuesday. 

The board signaled support Tuesday for raising monthly rents from $430 to $550 in 2027, but will wait until Oct. 14 to make a final decision. 

Housing Program Analyst Andrew Miller said that tenants would need to be notified of an increase by Nov. 2. He called rent increases “the most time sensitive item that we bring to you.”

The rent discussions come as construction began at the mobile home park Sept. 1, which includes site grading, installation...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Did you catch this gaslighting?

So the article starts with a moral outrage over high lot rents:

The board signaled support Tuesday for raising monthly rents from $430 to $550 in 2027

And then, buried later in the article, the bitter truth is revealed: the County owns the mobile home park (not some “evil private equity group” like the article implies):

The work marks a turning point for the mobile home park, which the county purchased in February 2018 for $6.5 million. According to a staff report, the county purchased the property with “the goal of preserving naturally occurring affordable housing for the benefit of the whole community.”

Now what was all that B.S. about how non-profits owning trailer parks keeps the rent down?

KATU: Seniors at Battle Ground Mobile Estates seek protections for mobile home parks

Preview:

BATTLE GROUND, Wash. (KATU) — A group of seniors living at Battle Ground Mobile Estates are calling for Battle Ground City Council to temporarily halt a proposed redevelopment of their community.

The mobile home park is home to around 350 people ages 55-plus.

Residents said they were warned earlier this year of a potential new buyer and are concerned redevelopment could push dozens of seniors out of their homes with limited housing options.

"There are people there that don't have anybody to watch out for them, and they're in their 80s," said Karen Scott, who lives at Battle Ground Mobile Estates. "I don't want them to be out on the street...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

The park owner wants $40 million, and the new buyer will surely redevelop the land into some more profitable use. The tenants, meanwhile, want some non-profits to buy the park for them. The usual math problem. At $40 million for 180 lots, that works out to $222,000 per space. That makes zero economic sense. Let the land move on to a better use with higher revenue and the residents need to find new places to live. Only a moron would waste $222,000 per lot to maintain this land as a trailer park.

Lookout: The right side of the tracks: St. Vincent de Paul of Lane County gives facelift to Saginaw Mobile Home Park

Preview:

A decade ago, Saginaw Mobile Home Park teetered on the brink. 

The park, developed in the 1950s, had become a hodgepodge of dilapidated trailers with rundown water and septic systems. Crime was high. Children played in muddy potholes on dirt roads at the 41-space park, located in a rural stretch north of Cottage Grove. 

These days, Saginaw Mobile Park has a different vibe. Local officials and nonprofit leaders gathered Friday, Sept. 18, to mark a milestone in the park’s transformation, which started when nonprofit St. Vincent de Paul of Lane County purchased the property in 2017 and started making improvements. 

The most recent upgrade:...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Let me get this straight. This non-profit spent $3.1 million for a 14-space trailer park. Now they’re buying ten new mobile homes to fill the lots (figure at least $100,000 per house). So in the end they’ll have spent around $4 million for 14 mobile homes on their tiny plots of land. That works out to around $300,000 per trailer. WTF. You could buy these people nice brick homes in a beautiful subdivision for the same amount of money. Did anyone bother to ask the tenants if they’d rather live in a trailer park vs. a nice subdivision? I’m guessing not.

TOTAL IDIOTS.

Marketplace: Residents of a mobile home park try to buy their community before someone else does

Preview:

Across the country, corporate investors and private equity firms are buying up mobile home parks, spending around $9 billion in 2021 alone, according to government data. Since then, the trend has continued, including in Colorado, where one park is hoping to avoid that fate.

Residents of Sunset Park, a community of 164 double-wide homes, have a multimillion-dollar problem.

“We've talked to different lenders, and the big thing seems to be price, at $44.5 million,” resident Tim Fritch said.

That is what the 24-acre park is listed for. Fritch and his neighbors were notified of the sale in April. So far, he said, lenders are hesitant to move...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

“I'm 78 years old. I work. I have to,” Berry said. “I should be retired by now, but I can't.”

There are two factors in retirement: cash-in and cash-out. Rather than fight to live in one of the most expensive states in the U.S., why doesn’t this guy simply find a nicer home in a rural area of an inexpensive state like Kansas, quit his job, live on Social Security and – with that expense cut of about 60% -- live like a king. There’s no way that people can be this stupid. If you don’t make a lot of money you have zero business living in Colorado.

But here’s the other thing that nobody appears smart enough to comprehend: this park is costing $44.5 million. Whoever buys it – the tenants or a professional owner – the rents are going to have to go up quantum to make sense of it as a park and not as a piece of raw land to build expensive condominiums on.

I will also add – even dumber than the two points above – is simply that this article is all part of the residents’ absurd attempt to raise $44.5 million to buy the park themselves. I think, at last count, they had raised $10,000. What a complete and total waste of time.

KGW8: Habitat for Humanity buys two Clark County mobile home parks to preserve affordable housing

Preview:

VANCOUVER, Wash. — Hidden Village Mobile Home Park is getting new owners, and for the people who have lived there for years, the change could mean more than a new name on the property.

For Michele Miller, the park has long had its share of problems.

“It’s had its ups and downs,” Miller said.

Ongoing issues she's dealt with at the park, include problems with the septic system and other issues she says the current owners have failed to address. Miller said ownership of the park has changed twice since she moved in. Conditions have also declined over the years, she said.

“There’s just been kind of a lot that has been let go in the...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Two important observations:

  1. Habitat for Humanity is spending $8 million to “save” 60 families from the “evils of private equity groups”. That works out to $134,000 per household. Wouldn’t these people be better off to be gifted real, stick-bult homes for free? Seems like an atrocious waste of taxpayer money. How exactly did the tenants gain anything from this transaction?

  2. Habitat is only buying this park to distract from the fact that it bought and then demolished Oak Grove Mobile Home Park in Mishawaka, Indiana, which actually displaced 117 households (twice the number that they are now “saving”). That’s gotta be in the running for the hypocrisy story of the year.

TribLive: Senior residents on fixed incomes urge state senators to pass House Bill 1250, ensuring rent doesn’t have to go up

Preview:

Nearly 60 residents took to the streets of Clover Commons in Plum last week to protest their rising land rent.

The quiet modular-home community in Plum has housed residents 55 and older for nearly 40 years. Now, folks that have lived there for decades are pinching pennies as they brace themselves for an 11% rent increase.

“It’s what you call an excessive rent increase,” Clover Commons resident Larry Forbes said.

Forbes and his wife, Patty, have lived at Clover Commons for six years. When they moved in, their rent was $590 per month.

“Currently, we pay $722 per month for the land our home sits on. Starting in October, our rent will jump to...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Who would possibly expect the woke idiots of Pennsylvania to ever give up on wanting to push their state government to pass HB 1250, which is the dead-on-arrival rent control bill? Look, Josh Shapiro and the socialists of America, it’s never, ever, ever, ever going to happen. The majority-Republican Senate in Pennsylvania have blockaded MH 1250 from the start and it will never see the light of day – no discussion and no vote in the Senate. So please just give it up. You’re embarrassing yourselves.

WTAE: Plum Borough Council backing Clover Commons residents as they face rent increases

Preview:

PLUM, Pa. —

Plum Borough Council backed residents in a senior housing community faced with rent increases by passing a resolution to encourage action from the state legislature.

On Monday, several Clover Commons residents attended the borough council meeting to speak out on rent increases at the 55+ adult community.

“It's just hard to afford it,” Maris Wentworth told Pittsburgh’s Action News 4 Reporter Jordan Cioppa.

Wentworth moved to Clover Commons in 2019. She said back then, her rent was $590, but that number continued to jump.

“Well, they're raising our rent from $722 to $800. We already got the notice,” Wentworth said. “We own our...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Plum Borough Council backed residents in a senior housing community faced with rent increases by passing a resolution to encourage action from the state legislature.

There s no weaker word in the English language – when it comes to politics – than “encourage”. It means nothing. It has no teeth. It has no deadline. It’s as ineffectual as sending James Talarico into a cage fight with a grizzly bear. So why even bother to write this article? Because Josh Shapiro, the Governor of Pennsylvania, is desperate for anything that might make him look like the great woke leader of rent control – which he can’t deliver on because the Republican Senate in Pennsylvania refuses to give him the time of day on that topic. Poor Josh is running out of time before the 2008 Presidential Election and his supporters know that. So an emergency signal – maybe like Batman’s searchlight only with a silhouette of AOC on it – has been sent apparently to all young, woke writers to ramp up the volume. It’s not going to work. Sorry, Josh. Your rent control initiative has officially failed.

The Builder's Daily: Putting the ROAD Act into action faces a funding and HUD gauntlet

Preview:

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act authorizes new programs and major regulatory changes, but most provisions need appropriations and rulemaking. HUD must complete 9 rulemakings and 70% of 125 federal actions, pointing to timelines into 2028.  AI Summary

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law two months ago.

Now comes the hard part: getting the money to get the results.

The implementation process, including securing funding for new programs and finalizing regulatory changes, could take from now until well into 2028, optimistically speaking.

After that, possibly, some early outcomes.

The bill, the most comprehensive...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

HUD must handle about 70% of 125 federal actions, rulemakings often take 18 to 24 months, and agency staffing is down more than 30%

Wait, so now you’re telling me that the world’s most ineffective housing act may never actually see the light of day due to a multi-year rules process? WHO CARES? Looks like my nickname “the Road to Nowhere Act” was totally accurate and then some.


Katu 2: Clark County considers restrictions on redevelopment of manufactured home parks

Preview:

Clark County is considering permanent restrictions on redevelopment of manufactured home parks. (KATU)

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

The concern for residents is that manufactured homes are different from many other types of housing. While residents may own their home, they often rent the land underneath it. If a park closes, older manufactured homes may be too difficult or expensive to relocate.

Using seniors as a trojan horse to spur rent control, to the benefit of all the non-seniors, is nothing new. But now the socialists are trying to take away the property rights of the mobile home park owners for redevelopment, as well. They know that rent control leads to park demolition and they can’t stuff their will down the throats of the park owners if they can simply redevelop. But what’s really puzzling on this article is how anyone with an IQ higher than a lima bean would believe that what makes mobile home parks different from “all other types of housing” is that residents “own their homes and rent the land underneath”. How does that argument make any difference at all? Let’s look at a high-rise condominium, for example. You own your unit but you effectively communally “rent” the land underneath via a condominium association fee. The socialist argument has always been that the landlord can raise the rent and the tenants have no choice but to move their homes. But what about simply selling the mobile home where it sits? How is that any different from the high-rise condominium owner, who has to sell if the association fee becomes too high? You know the answer: there isn’t any difference.

Luminaria: Tucson and Pima County begin disbursing first of millions of mobile home program funds from federal grant

Preview:

When Robert Meade noticed a storm had blown a number of shingles off the roof of his four-room manufactured home several years ago, his heart sank. Meade, who is in his 80s, didn’t know how they would fix the roof until his granddaughter told him she had found a county program that would help. 

“We don’t have a lot of money and we can’t do it ourselves,” said Meade, when interviewed by Arizona Luminaria in the summer of 2025. “They did such a good job, I would recommend them to anyone.” 

The county repair program that helped make a $10,000 investment in fixing the roof on the Meade family’s manufactured home will now receive an infusion...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

The second agreement is for the Pima County EELS, an emergency eviction legal service, to receive $976,399 to assist up to 250 households at risk of eviction in the grant’s service area. “We anticipate preserving over 150 homes, creating one resident-owned community, protecting up to 250 households from eviction, and providing education and outreach to 480 residents,” 

At first, I thought this article was about a program to help renovate old, beat-up mobile homes. Then I read farther and realized that was a trojan horse. The real point of this program is to spread the usual socialist mantra that tenants should live for free and that tenants should own their own parks. The Democratic Socialists of America have apparently embedded themselves deep into the Arizona public housing bureacracy.

WSJM: South Haven City Council rejects rezoning for proposed manufactured home community

Preview:

The South Haven City Council has rejected a proposed ordinance to rezone a property at 120 Baseline Road, where a developer is proposing a manufactured home community of 24 units.

At a Tuesday meeting, council once again heard from a long line of residents opposed to the plan from property owner Eric Rothner, who has said he already has parties lined up and willing to move into the modular homes. Opposing neighbors say rezoning the site from Multiple Family Residential to Manufactured Housing Community to allow that will cede some local control to the Michigan Manufactured Housing Commission, result in less local taxes being collected,...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

At a Tuesday meeting, council once again heard from a long line of residents opposed to the plan …

This is exactly why new mobile home parks will never be built: nobody wants to be anywhere near them as they make their property values decline. It’s a fact that is easily demonstrated on Zillow – just look at the price of a house next to a “trailer park” vs. a couple blocks away. And since the city council members represent the residents of the city or town – which is what they are elected to do – it’s perfectly appropriate for them to vote against any concept that includes mobile homes. From a supply-side moat, that’s great for all park owners. But what’s crazy is that there are those who think that you CAN get new mobile home park zoning. I’ve been in this business for over 30 years, and I think I’ve seen maybe one permit issued for a ground-up new mobile home park in all that time. You have a better shot at getting a photo of Bigfoot.

Governing: How States Can Make More Room for Manufactured Housing

Preview:

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which was passed by Congress with broad bipartisan support and became law in July 2026, includes several provisions intended to expand the use of manufactured housing in the United States. However, many states will need to update their policies in accordance with the federal changes so that manufactured housing can grow. Individual states can prepare for and ultimately multiply the effect of federal legislation by passing laws and enacting policies that make it easier to install manufactured housing in more places. Some changes would cost little to nothing and could have a rapid effect.

Manufactured...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Manufactured homes cost substantially less to build than conventional houses, but zoning, financing and other policy barriers continue to limit where they can go and who can buy them.

There are virtually zero new mobile home parks bult in the U.S. each year based on one item: zoning. Parks are banned in nearly every city and town in the U.S. and getting a variance is basically impossible. That’s why the “Road to Housing Act” will never go anywhere – it’s based on this bizarre idea that mobile home park zoning is attainable. Since it’s not, and never will be, none of this has any importance at all.



Fox 5: Seniors at East Las Vegas mobile home park push back on rent hikes

Preview:

LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — Dozens of seniors living at Maycliffe Estates, a mobile home park in East Las Vegas, say they are being priced out of their homes. Residents accuse the park’s new owners, a Utah-based corporation, of raising lot rents while the property deteriorates.

Residents told FOX5 News that this is just one of the reasons they are opposing the increase. Residents have gathered signatures for a petition and are demanding that local officials step in.

Residents call rent hike “elder abuse”

Because many tenants are seniors, residents are calling the rent hike elder abuse. They have begun the process of filing a petition with the...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Because many tenants are seniors, residents are calling the rent hike elder abuse. They have begun the process of filing a petition with the Nevada Attorney General’s office.

Just because seniors don’t like higher prices does not make it “elder abuse”. Based on that argument, every business in America – from McDonald’s to Walmart – is engaged in “elder abuse”. Additionally, Nevada is not trifecta blue, and has no rent control, so the park owner has every legal right to raise the rents to whatever level they see fit.

As for the tenant’s argument that the “rents have gone up while the quality of the park has gone done” this false claim was immediately shot down by the new owners, who showed they have spent over $1 million in park improvements.

As I have written about many times, woke socialists are trying to use seniors as “trojan horses” for rent control, making it all about the elderly while the young people with jobs slither in under the same rent control laws. But here’s the socialists’ problem in Nevada: it has zero chance for rent control and everyone knows that. Why? Because it’s not trifecta blue.

I sometimes wonder if the idiot woke kids writing this crap are aware that there’s no point in writing rent control articles in any state that is not trifecta blue?

Spectrum News: Saco passes mobile home park rent ordinance

Preview:

SACO, Maine – The Saco City Council voted to enact a new local ordinance Monday to regulate mobile home park rental rates.

The ordinance controls how often and by how much landlords can raise lot rents in parks such as the Blue Haven Mobile Home Park on Portland Road.

“Certainly, the important thing right now is to get this passed and get as much protection as possible to the residents in Blue Haven and mobile home parks,” Councilor Sandra Guay said at Monday night’s meeting.

The ordinance indicated that landlords cannot raise rents more than once a year. It also mandates a 90-day notice to tenants before raising the rent. It also limits...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Endless Maine rent control wonderment by woke writers is getting a little tiresome. So Maine is a communist state – we all know that. That it has the among the worst rankings of any state on education, economy and health – we all know that, too. So now they’re going to focus on ruining their affordable housing industry. No shock there.

Spectrum News: New federal housing law could reshape manufactured homes in Florida

Preview:

FLORIDA — A new federal housing law could change how manufactured homes are financed and, over time, how some are built.

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, signed into law July 11, raises FHA-insured loan limits for manufactured housing and changes the federal definition of a manufactured home by allowing homes to be built with or without a permanent chassis.

At Jacobsen Homes in Florida, longtime industry veteran Mike Wnek said manufactured housing has changed dramatically since he entered the business in 1978.

“Night and day. Back in ’78, we were building trailers. We were building a new modern manufactured home, but it was still...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

People are getting overly excited about the new law (which is still in the actual draft of the rules phase) that allows the chassis to be removed from the mobile home. Removing the old-fashioned “boat trailer” sounds great on paper, but mobile homes have to have something structural at the bottom to sit on, and the replacement may have its own disadvantages. I have talked to several people on the manufacturing side of the industry and the consensus is that 1) it won’t bring the cost down at all and 2) it will actually increase the delivery and setting cost (some home sets will require a crane). I am all in favor of getting mobile homes as close to the ground as possible – the skirting smacks of “trailer trash” – but, like doublewides, I don’t think any of this will matter to park owners, as opposed to those buying a home to go on their own private land.

Arkansas Business: ‘We’re Not Grandma’s Trailer’: Manufactured Housing Eyes a New Era

Preview:

Leaders in the manufactured housing industry believe they can be part of the solution to America’s housing problem.

And they believe the recently passed federal housing bill makes a change that will allow them to do just that.

Congress passed the 21st Century Road to Housing Act in June, and the bill became law in July without President Donald Trump’s signature. The bill, sponsored by U.S. Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., addresses a variety of housing issues from regulatory reforms to the administration of public housing.

The bill also addresses a long-standing concern in the manufactured housing industry by eliminating the requirement for a...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Who did the P.R. for the Road to Housing Act? Never before has such a meaningless legislation given the impression that it has real substance. Has anyone actually read this thing? I’m betting the answer is no. If you had you’d know that it’s the political equivalent of me trying to dunk a basketball.

ABC 9 News: San Lazaro residents need millions to buy their Boulder County mobile home park before someone else does

Preview:

BOULDER COUNTY, Colo. — Residents of San Lazaro Mobile Home Park have until Dec. 8 to assemble financing for a competing offer after an unidentified buyer offered $42.5 million for the property.

The full-price offer adds urgency to a resident-led effort to turn San Lazaro into a cooperative. Residents say owning the park would give them more control over lot rents, infrastructure and the future of a community where some families have lived for decades.

San Lazaro has 213 households. The park’s public water system reports serving 844 people.

Most residents own their manufactured homes but pay slightly more than $1,000 each month to...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Yes, it’s the same thing as last week, in which the residents have to raise $43 million by December to buy their park. But don’t worry, they’ve already raised $50,000 so they’re only a mere $42,950,000 short of the goal at this point. Piece of cake, right?

Gabe Vasquez: Rep. Gabe Vasquez Calls for Hearing to Protect Manufactured Housing Communities from Private Equity

Preview:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Representative Gabe Vasquez (NM-02) called on the House Financial Services Committee to hold a hearing on institutional investors’ impact on Manufactured Housing Communities (MHCs) across the country. Congressman Vasquez led a letter to Chairman French Hill (R-AR) and Ranking Member Maxine Waters (D-CA) — along with five other Members — urging the Committee to hold a hearing to address reports from MHC residents across the country who have said they have experienced price jacking, utilities neglect, and abuse in these communities after private equity firms purchased their communities.

“Congress recently passed a...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

Did Vasquez actually read the Road to Housing Act? The Act literally has zero impact on private equity groups buying single-family homes. But even if it did, the awful truth is that every private equity group in the U.S. combined owns less than 1% of all single-family homes. The endless gaslighting by George Soros on how evil private equity groups are has gained frightening traction.

The Quad-Times City: Mobile home park owner plans to build apartments on State Street in Bettendorf

Preview:

ABettendorf developer is pursuing state and local tax incentives to build a 168-unit apartment complex to replace the Hillside Community mobile home park along State Street. 

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

The plans focus on resident education and outreach, monitoring funding sources and policy changes, strategic engagement with individual communities, and expanding affordable homeownership opportunities.  

That quote’s so dumb my first thought was “did Kamala write that?”.

M Live: Muskegon organizations pitch in to help displaced mobile home residents

Preview:

MUSKEGON COUNTY, MI — Resources are available for residents affected by the abrupt closure of Mona Lake Mobile Home Park in Muskegon Heights.

Public Health Muskegon County is hosting a resource fair from 2-6 p.m. today, Thursday, Sept. 3, across from the park at 3527 Hoyt Ave.

 

Local organizations and businesses will be onsite providing information on topics such as housing options, moving services and supplies, school enrollment, legal assistance, senior services, referrals and more.

 

Participating organizations include United Way Lakeshore, Trinity Health, The Salvation Army, Legal Aid of Western Michigan and Health...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

And another park bites the dust.

PESP: Michigan MHAction residents celebrate one year of new, non-corporate owners

Preview:

In early August, a manufactured housing community formerly known as North Morris Estates in Thetford Township, Michigan met an important milestone: the park is now fully licensed to operate by state regulators.[1]

The new license marks a historic win after a period of extended tumult under the park’s former owners, the hedge fund Alden Global Capital and its manufactured housing subsidiary Homes of America. In August of 2024, the Genesee County Prosecutor filed criminal charges against former owner Homes of America for running the mobile home park without a license in the city of Mount Morris. Homes of America pleaded guilty to a one-year...

Read More

Our thoughts on this story:

Frank Rolfe

This “article” is literally nothing more than a P.R. release from George Soros’ Private Equity Stakeholders Project, which is trying to convince every woke idiot out there that the greatest risks to civilization are private equity groups. They’re not. They do great things for the nation. They take on turn-arounds that nobody else has the capital to tackle. And, like Rodney Daingerfield, “they don’t get no respect”.